Attorney Vitalii Petryk successfully challenged an administrative offense protocol under Part 1 of Art. 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses
In the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv, attorney Vitalii Petryk successfully challenged an administrative offense protocol under Part 1 of Art. 130 (driving a vehicle while intoxicated).
The court established that the police officers had no grounds to demand a sobriety examination, as no signs of alcohol intoxication had been recorded in the driver.
On this basis the court closed the proceedings due to the absence of an administrative offense in the driver’s actions.
Importantly, in this case attorney Vitalii Petryk managed to prove the following:
- The police officers had no lawful grounds to stop the vehicle.
- The video recording attached to the protocol contained no evidence that the driver was intoxicated.
- The driver did not refuse the sobriety examination, but was not given the opportunity to undergo it properly.
This case is another example of how an attorney’s professional work helps protect a client’s rights and legitimate interests.
If you find yourself in a similar situation, we recommend seeking help from attorney Vitalii Petryk.
Contact information:
- Phone: (096)-878-07-36, (093)-878-07-36
Other Items

Appealing a verdict: appeal and cassation

Preventive measures: how to avoid being remanded in custody

Leaving the scene of an accident: consequences and what to do
